Go to the Beginning of This Section 3. The Age of the Universe: Evolution Science vs. Creation Creationism vs. Evolution
Intelligent Design Theory HOME PAGE
PREFACE: Intelligent Design Theory Explains 2 Mysteries: Gravity and the Structure of the Atom
TABLE OF CONTENTS of Intelligent Design Theory
FOREWORD: Three Important Events Not Taught in School: Creation of the Earth, Noah's Ark and Jesus' Death and Resurrection
NEXT PAGE: Dust and Gas in Space and the Speed of Light in Vacuum, Air and Water and the Time of Creation of the Earth
PREVIOUS PAGE: God and the Size of the Universe
INDEX of Intelligent Design Theory - Creationism Vs. Evolution Book Keywords
RELATED LINKS, Pro and Con
Contact the Author
26. Five Facts about Big Bang, Black Holes and the Edwin Hubble Red Shift
Intelligent Design Theory gives evidence that evolution based on what is the big bang theory, black holes in space, the Edwin Hubble red shift, the expanding universe theory and time of creation is based on false conclusions and speculation rather than science. Big Bang theory, the expanding universe theory and age of the earth and age of the universe are all based on the Hubble red shift theory of light from stars. This red shift is not caused by the Big Bang theory of the so-called expanding universe, but by slowing of the speed of light from dust and gas in space, as the ionization of gas in front of comets in space clearly shows, and as hundreds of photos of dust and gas in front of comets in space clearly show. The changing speed of light with time and red shift due to dust and gas in space correct the time of creation from billions of years to six thousand years.
The parallax error method and Cepheid star variable method of determining the distance of stars may be good approximations of distances of stars. But the red shift method of measuring the velocity of stars and the expanding universe theory are highly questionable, as is super massive black holes in space theory. While these theories have been accepted as fact, there is reason to believe that they are false assumptions. See Related Links.
In 1842, Christian Doppler postulated that the color of light from a star approaching us would be shifted toward blue and the color of light from a star going away from us would be a red shift. Suppose instead, that the Edwin Hubble red shift is primarily caused by dust and gas in space rather than by stars racing away from us and blue shift is caused by a lack of dust and gas in the space around the star. We then would have science based on a false assumption of an expanding universe and that the stars are racing away from us.
Did you know that according to Einstein there is no such thing as red shift? How can there be red shift if the speed of light is constant whether a star is approaching you or speeding away from you?
Building on what may be a false assumption by Doppler; in 1929 astronomer Edwin Powell Hubble came to what may be a false conclusion that the amount of red shift of light coming from stars and galaxies is related to the velocity of the stars racing away from the earth and the expanding universe theory. The astronomer Hubble also found that the farther the stars are from the earth, the greater the red shift, and therefore, the greater the velocities and the expanding universe theory. Hubble also found that if red shift is double that of another star, that star is twice as far away. This can be a good assumption of the distance, but I discovered that the reason for double the red shift with distance very coincidentally happens to be the same if the light is passing through twice as much dust and gas in space. The astronomer Edwin Powell Hubble's conclusions led to the questionable conclusion that stars are accelerating away from each other, and the conclusions of subsequent scientists that beyond a certain distance from the earth the stars are traveling at much greater velocities than the speed of light. Yet their hero Albert Einstein's theory said it is impossible for any object to exceed the speed of light because at the speed of light, its mass becomes infinite. If this were true, the mass of any material on earth would increase as its temperature increases, because the frequency of the electron vibrations increase, and hence the velocity of the vibrating electrons increase until the material glows (reaches the frequency of light). If this were sound reasoning, the mass of an electron emitting light is infinite instead of remaining constant. Actually, the opposite is true: the higher the temperature, the lower the mass per unit volume is because the material expands at higher temperatures.
Both Einstein's theory and astronomer
Hubble's discovery were quickly accepted by the scientific community. From
this, scientists arrived at the dubious "Big Bang" theory that all
the galaxies in the universe started out the size of a pinhead and exploded to
form all the hundreds of billions of galaxies, each galaxy having about a
hundred billion stars. The Big Bang Theory takes an enormous amount of
imagination and faith, and yet was readily accepted.
The concept of black holes in space
is an evolutionist attempt to prove
antimatter, big bang and black
holes and that universes are created and destroyed over and over
The concept of black holes in space is an evolutionist attempt to prove antimatter, big bang and black holes and that universes are created and destroyed over and over again.
Astronomer Hubble's conclusion from red shift is in direct opposition to the Einstein theory of constancy of the speed of light. Red shift of light is not caused by velocity, but by dust and gas in space. Scientists explain the conflict with the speed of light not as a slowing of the speed of light, but as a slowing of the frequency of the light as the stars move away from us due to the expanding universe theory. Einstein's theory that all motions are relative is ignored. According to Einstein, to one standing on a star, there is no motion, and hence no change of frequency of the light leaving it. Einstein taught that the speed of light is independent of the velocity of the source, and the speed of light is constant in every direction with no red shift effect; hence, there is no change of frequency, or red shift from its source.
A star going faster than the speed of light is also in direct opposition to the Einstein theory that when an object approaches the speed of light, its mass becomes infinite. Einstein taught that nothing can move faster than the speed of light. Scientists have not been able to explain how a star can move faster than the speed of light. So who was wrong, Einstein, or all the scientists that believe Einstein's theories while simultaneously refuting Einstein's theories? We will learn that both are wrong. Conclusions based on false conclusions are always wrong.
The time of creation given in the Bible as about 4,000 BC is ridiculed because from the distances of the stars and the supposed constancy of the speed of light, they concluded that the universe is somewhere between twelve and twenty billion years old. How could we possibly see the stars if the universe is only 6000 years old, they argued, when it takes twelve to twenty billion years for the light of the stars to reach us? Intelligent Design Theory should be taught in school instead of teaching unproven assumptions as if they were truth. All this makes sense when the US Constitution Supreme Court separation of church and state ruling only allows and encompasses the commonly accepted theories leading to the supposed age of the universe.
False assumptions can only lead to false conclusions. As a result, the scientific community concluded that enough time has passed that evolution is not only possible, but modern Charles Darwin's theory of evolution evidence and proof is an absolute fact. This is the result of false "scientific proof" based on the time it takes the light from stars to reach us, and the time it would take to get where we are as a result of the Big Bang. Even if the earth is billions of years old, this does not prove that it was not created by an Intelligent Designer. These false conclusions disregard the obvious violations of Einstein Relativity and the Speed of Light and the obvious observation that it would be impossible to pack all the enormous amount of matter in the universe into a pinhead.
Black Holes in space and what is the Big Bang theory contradict each other. The Big Bang Theory claims that massive matter explodes. Black Holes in space theorists claim that massive matter annihilates itself. Which is true and which is false? Intelligent Design Theory tells us that both Big Bangs in space and Black Holes in space theory are false.
Another possible false theory is that the universe is expanding faster than the speed of light. This contradicts the Einstein theory that nothing can move faster than the speed of light. The Big Bang would give the stars an initial velocity. They would then decelerate due to gravitational attraction, not accelerate. To counteract this contradiction, scientists have now come up with another unproven theory: that empty space has repulsive energy that they call "Dark Energy".
According to astronomers, ordinary matter in space accounts for only 4.6 percent of the mass energy density of the observable universe. (How much of the universe is observable?) Space has an avaergae temperature of 2.7 degrees Kelvin. This temperature of unseen space is demonstrated by the ionized gas in front of comets.
The observable objects in the universe are a tiny amount compared to the space surrounding them. I believe that invisible dust and gas in space make up the missing "Dark Matter". This “dark matter” does not have a repulsive effect, as today’s scientists foolishly claim; this matter has the attractive effect of gravity! According to astronomers, observable (ordinary) matter makes up 20% of the universe. If this is so, I believe that the other 80 percent of the matter in the universe is the dust and gas that we find in space. Therefore, the stars at the edge of the universe cannot be increasing in velocity, but must be slowing down, if they are indeed moving.
It is possible that dust and gas could decrease the frequency and the speed of light, especially if the true nature of light is understood. With dust and gas in space, the greater the distance, the more that both the frequency and the speed of light would be decreased. Are scientists ignoring that possibility, or do they refuse to discuss dust and gas in space because it would negate their religion, their faith, their imagination and belief that the universe is billions of years old and the Big Bang theory and their justification for evolution? Intelligent Design Theory in the following sections will present evidence that evolution based on big bang and super massive black holes in space theory, the Edwin Hubble red shift and the theory of the universe expanding faster than the speed of light is based on one false conclusion after another rather than on science.
Copyright (C) 2007, 2012 Robert L. Laing All rights reserved
The 6 Most Popular Pages on IntelligentDesignTheory.info:
The Unique Properties of Water
The Niels Bohr Atom Model
The Speed of Light
The Carbon Atom Model and Diamond Picture
Antimatter, Big Bang and Black Holes
37 Facts of Creation vs. 30 False Theories of Evolution
FREE INTERNET BOOK:
Paperback by author available:
History of Jesus Christ the Human God
Paperback by author available: Little Thinkers -- Squeezing Common Sense Out of Life's Toughest Questions
Paperback by author available: Intelligent Design Theory -- Squeezing Common Sense out of Science, Creation, Noah's Ark and Jesus Christ