Intelligent Design Theory HOME PAGE

PREFACE: Intelligent Design Theory Explains 2 Mysteries: Gravity and the Structure of the Atom

TABLE OF CONTENTS of Intelligent Design Theory

FOREWORD: Three Important Events Not Taught in School:  Creation of the Earth, Noah's Ark and Jesus' Death and Resurrection

NEXT PAGE: Questionable Proof of Modern Charles Darwin Theory of Evolution Evidence

PREVIOUS PAGE: Evidences of The Great Flood Are Carbon Dating, Fossils, Mountains, Meteors, Dinosaurs and Mammoths

INDEX of Intelligent Design Theory - Creationism Vs. Evolution Book Keywords


Contact the Author in any language. Why are you here? Were you able to find what you were looking for? If not, why not?


Section 19. Evolution versus Intelligent Design Theory

91. Charles Darwin’s Theory of Natural Selection and Survival of the Fittest

Darwin's theory of evolution gave the atheists what they needed to justify their faith.  It was logical.  It made sense. Over the next two hundred years, many hoaxes were perpetrated to substantiate the science of evolution that can only be described as unscientific. A pig's tooth was used to construct an artist's rendering of a creature halfway between an ape and a man. Pieces of bone found miles apart were said to be the same animal. As the years went by, frauds were exposed and the missing links were never found. Darwin's theory remained unproven. The scientific community moved from the logic of Darwin to Punctuated Equilibrium and the Big Bang into a labyrinth of creation vs. evolution fantasy.


They extended their theories first into the realm of atomic physics, then to the Universe itself. The more outrageously ridiculous the theory, the more eagerly it was grasped and accepted by the scientific community. The structure of the atom was fabricated to contain dozens of disintegrating fragments of protons and electrons that were blasted to smithereens by atom smashers. Light became a mystical entity that was simultaneously a finite material particle and an ethereal electromagnetic wave. Light cannot be both, yet it is, according to the scientists.  Light took on the bizarre ability to travel toward you at the same velocity whether you were approaching the light source or going away from it.


Time became a variable. If you were on a train headed for Aunt Bessie, not only did your watch read differently than Aunt Bessie's, both watches were correct. Now these "scientists" are trying to figure out how to travel back to the past and into the future. The pitiful thing is that they believe it, and they are credited in the media as being credible. These scientists espouse their theories as fact and many ordinary folks are fooled by such nonsense.


These scientists claim that if the earth would cease its annual course around the sun, you would weigh less. True science tells us that if the earth stopped spinning you would weigh more because the centrifugal force that is counteracting gravity would cease. They believe that there evolved a universe of anti-matter, as real as ours, with anti-persons. If you should meet your anti-person, it will look like you. But don't shake its hand, or you will both be neutralized and will disappear forever. The atoms you are made of will cease to exist, today's scientists believe.


Today's so-called scientists say the earth doesn't really revolve around the Sun. It is really travelling in a straight line. But the straight line is warped by the gravity of the sun, so it appears that we make an annual journey around the Sun. There is no such thing as gravity, according to the gurus. It is simply a warp in space because there is mass in the way.


In our university-sponsored and boasted science, the Universe exists because the gravity (Whoops! the warp in space) caused by the anti-matter in imaginary black holes is so great that it sucks all surrounding matter into it. They believe if the black hole is too far away to suck it in, this terrible suction creates matter out nearby space around the black hole. 


A rock is 300 million years old. We know this because a fossil was found near it that is 300 million years old. We know the fossil is 300 million years old because the rocks around it are 300 million years old. As you can plainly see, there are no discrepancies here.


Evolution-promoting "scientists" are the most biased group of scientists on earth today. They hide any scientific discoveries and refuse to discuss any evidence that disproves their theories. The Smithsonian Institute has hidden any evidence that contradicts the theory of evolution: Evolution-believing "scientists" dismiss any scientific evidence that does not fit, acting as if it is unworthy of discussion. They espouse their speculative theories to the public as if they were absolutely proven facts, and this deception is promoted by secular schools, our government and the mass news media. So both students and the public end up believing and being deceived by false information as if it were the truth.


If you do not accept these insane concepts, you will be denied a PhD degree from any secular university. You failed to learn what your professors were trying to teach you, so how can you possibly teach others? If you are a college professor, and you have a mental collapse and teach that these theories are rubbish, you will soon be looking for another job, perhaps bagging groceries at a supermarket.


I am neither an astronomer nor an atomic physicist, thank God. I am only an engineer, a layman in what this book discusses. Therefore, I have no right to write this book. Naturally, since I am untrained, this book will be scoffed at and rejected by the scientific community.


Another reason you should not read this book is that some of the concepts did not even come from me. They came mostly from a "mythical God who does not exist" (according to evolutionists). In 1993 I received a Bible study from Rev. J. Preston Eby, of El Paso, Texas. Rev. Eby pointed out many Bible verses that discussed astronomy, and how they turned out to be true. This brought back memories of arguments I had in the past with certain scientific theories. It excited me so much that it became a consuming fire. I began studying and writing late into each night, falling asleep to wake an hour or two later with a new discovery. Then I would write until it was time to go to work. I would go home ten to twelve hours later, again consumed by these discoveries.  I awoke in the middle the night almost every night for three years after I asked God to explain to me things like what gravity really is. I also asked, "If the Bible is true, and the speed of light is constant. then how did light get from the stars to the earth instantaneously 6,00 years ago?" The answers did not come as you will see them written. They usually came bit by bit, one tiny precept at a time, until a whole new concept developed. Before this I always knew what I wanted to write before I wrote it. This time, I did not know what I was writing until it was done. I was probably more amazed at the answers than you will be. 


If I were to use blue ink in this book for what I think God told me, black ink for what I conceived myself, and green ink for what I got from others, this would be a multi-colored book. The colors might change in the middle of a sentence. And here is another reason to ignore this book:  I personally am most confident about the parts that would be in blue. The entire concept of the real structure of the atom would be blue, even though I had a background in electron beam Van de Graff generators, involving electron ballistics, developed new equations and got patents on it all over the world. The rest, I wonder about.


So my advice to you is, don't read this book. If you do, things like gravity, magnetism, the nature and speed of light, and our amazing universe might begin to make sense to you. And then you will be considered an ignoramus, meaning one who knows things not taught in college, and ostracized from the scientific community, like me. This was not always true. Science was developed mostly by scientists that believed in God. It appears to me that those scientists that were closest to God received scientific inspiration directly from the Creator. It also appears to me that atheist scientists receive nonsensical gibberish from places other than the kingdom of God. My advice to today's scientists if you want to really become great scientists like your Christian predecessors you need to accept Jesus Christ as God's only begotten Son. Then if you get close enough to Him, you will not only receive great scientific inspiration, but will not perish, and will have everlasting life. Is that not a good enough benefit for believing in the most historical being that ever lived?


Proverbs 1

 27.  When your fear cometh as desolation, and your destruction cometh as a whirlwind; when distress and anguish cometh upon you,

 28.  Then shall they call upon me, but I will not answer; they shall seek me early, but they shall not find me:

 29.  For that they hated knowledge, and did not choose the fear of the LORD:

 30.  They would have none of my counsel: they despised all my reproof.

 31.  Therefore shall they eat of the fruit of their own way, and be filled with their own devices.

 32.  For the turning away of the simple shall slay them, and the prosperity of fools shall destroy them.

 33.  But whoso hearkens unto me shall dwell safely, and shall be quiet from fear of evil.


Psalms 1

 1. Blessed is the man that walks not in the counsel of the ungodly, nor stands in the way of sinners, nor sits in the seat of the scornful.

 2.  But his delight is in the law of the LORD; and in his law doth he meditate day and night.

 3.  And he shall be like a tree planted by the rivers of water, that brings forth his fruit in his season; his leaf also shall not wither; and whatsoever he does shall prosper.

 4. The ungodly are not so: but are like the chaff which the wind drives away.

 5.  Therefore the ungodly shall not be justified in the judgment, or sinners in the congregation of the righteous.

 6.  For the LORD knows the way of the righteous: but the way of the ungodly shall perish.


John 10:21. Could a devil open the eyes of the blind?


The scientific community has turned science into dreams that can only be described as unscientific fantasy. The only true science is the sound, observable, testable, verifiable, repeatable experimental results established by creation scientists who understood that the universe was created by Intelligent Design. In fact almost all of the scientific advancements responsible for today's technology are the result of famous true scientists who believed in God. Evolutionist misconceptions are not their fault. It is the result of everything they have ever been taught in the classrooms. Jesus said do not judge, lest you be judged. We should pray for these people instead, asking that they accept Jesus as God's only Son so that they will not perish in hell, but have everlasting life in Heaven. Intelligent Design Theory should be taught in school.


Suggested Reading

Barnett, Lincoln, 1948.  The Universe and Dr. Einstein.

Einstein, Albert, Leopold Infeld, 1961. The Evolution of Physics.

Hawking, Stephen W. A, 1994. A Brief History of Time from the Big Bang to Black Holes.

Eby, J. Preston, The Heavens Declare . . . (monthly publications).


Copyright (C) 2010 Robert L. Laing  All rights reserved


The 6 Most Popular Pages on

The Unique Properties of Water

The Niels Bohr Atom Model

The Speed of Light

The Carbon Atom Model and Diamond Picture

Antimatter, Big Bang and Black Holes

37 Facts of Creation vs. 30 False Theories of Evolution



Paperback by author available: History of Jesus Christ the Human God
Paperback by author available: Little Thinkers -- Squeezing Common Sense Out of Life's Toughest Questions

Paperback by author available: Intelligent Design Theory -- Squeezing Common Sense out of Science, Creation, Noah's Ark and Jesus Christ